DenGro | B2B SaaS

Creating a UI (unbelievably intuative), UI.

Designing and developing an award-winning, industry leading SaaS product, loved by its users.

As the dental industry continues to become a more commercial space, the need to capture, track, nurture and convert leads interested in high value cosmetic dental treatments is business critical. With generic, off-the-shelf lead management software not providing the tools best suited to the practice team, there was an opportunity to create a simple SaaS product that reflected the needs of the modern practice.

 
 

The Goal

Create a truly useful business tool that provides value and insight for all stakeholders.

The Challenge

Dental practices are busy places. The last thing staff need is ‘another tool’ to ‘help’ them to do their job. So, DenGro had to be two things; simple - to ensure it was adopted by the reception and wider practice team and; empowering - so the manager and principal had the numbers they needed to make business and marketing decisions (and keep paying the monthly subscription).

 
 

Research

As the stakeholders were already immersed within the dental industry, a certain level of user insight was already known. However, qualitative research in the form of face to face and telephone interviews were conducted with stakeholders to ensure initial assumptions were accurate.

User Types

There were four types of user who could have access to DenGro, for different purposes.

  • Reception Team - to follow up and document leads interested in treatment.

  • Practice Manager - to check how many leads are enquring about treatment as well as check on staff performance.

  • Practice Principal / Business Owner - to have an overview of practice performance.

  • Media/Marketing Agency - to check on lead conversion peformance and if required, adjust the media buying accordingly.

 
 
 

User Personas

Personas were created for each User Type. Once created, based on the research, this provided some interesting insight into the products' audience. For example, the age and digital competence of the Reception teams was extremely broad. This would need to be accounted for in the design and presenation of the tool.

 
 

Initial Designs

With research in hand and list of specific thoughts on feature requirements initial designs were drawn and then visualised in Sketch. A basic interactive prototype was then created in Invision and shared and tested with some of the research candidates.

Minor feedback was provided, which was rolled into the next phase of the process, the MVP.

 
DenGrov2.jpeg
 
 
 

MVP

The MVP was relatively high fidelity, engineered over 8 weeks and rolled out to a BETA test group of 30 practices. Introductory training was provided and instant chat support offered to practices where required.

BETA Testing

BETA testing was carried out over a period of 6 months and the product reviewed using;

  • Qualitative research - telephone interviews.

  • Quantitative research - online questionnaires.

  • Support tickets - tagging tickets to count repetitive instances of support.

  • Hotjar - reviewing actual user journeys to highlight any pain points.

On the whole the tool was considered very useful in practice, but we discovered two major fundamental flaws.

  • Once patients decided to go ahead with treatment, Reception teams would forget to mark leads as ‘Going ahead’ and so the conversion loop (and all the reporting with it) would be incomplete.

  • ‘Tasks’ were passive. They told the Reception team that a new lead existed, but it did not provide instruction.

 
DenGro_Testing.jpeg
 
DenGro_Results_01.jpeg
 
 
DenGro_Heatmapping.jpeg
 
DenGro_Results_02.jpeg
 

BETA Learnings

DenGro needed to make sure that tasks were actioned so the conversion loop was closed.

To combat these two flaws, a redesign of the interface was proposed - a wizard style interface would be introduced, one which asked the user to complete an action before being able to move to the next step of the conversion process and by answering those questions in turn, moving their lead through the conversion process.

This method also provided much more data and insight about each stage of the conversion process.

User Journey Flows

Closed user flows were a great idea, but with multiple responses per question, could very quickly become a complicated sequence of logic. The following image shows the logic flow for the initial question posed to users for the dental treatment, Invisalign.

 
 
 

Outcome

The reengineered product was released to the BETA test group and very quickly provided more solid user and consumer results, with conversion loops closed and users suggesting the redesigned interface was superior to the last.

With a sound product, DenGro was released from BETA to the wider dental industry. 

Project Learnings

I've taken away a great deal of learning from this project, the main points being:

  • We understood that we had to make the product as simple as possible, but we had assumed that users would actually want to, or remember to complete tasks. This wasn’t always the case. Creating the ‘wizard’ style interface made it fool-proof.

  • We could have overcome this reengineering stage by creating a high-fidelity prototype, one which truly replicated every part of the initial process.

  • What a user says they will do and what a user actually does can be two completely different things!

Product Success

  • DenGro was awarded ‘High Technology Launch of the Year’ and shortlisted for ‘Innovation of the Year’ by the Dental Industry in 2018/19.

  • DenGro currently has a customer base of over 500 practices in the UK.

 
DenGro_Today_01_01.jpg
DenGro_Map.jpg
 
 
DenGro_Today_01_02.jpg
DenGro_Bar.jpg
20180518_143948528_iOS.jpg
 
DenGro_Automate.jpg

Next >